• News
  • Security
  • Products
  • About Seqrite
Blogs on Information Technology, Network & Cybersecurity | Seqrite Blog
  • News
  • Security
  • Products
  • About Seqrite
Home  /  Security  /  Evolution of jRAT JAVA Malware
Evolution of jRAT JAVA Malware
03 October 2017

Evolution of jRAT JAVA Malware

Written by Pavankumar Chaudhari
Pavankumar Chaudhari
Security

jRAT (Java Based Remote Access Trojans) malware is not new but its activity has increased recently in the last few months and they are targeting various organizations. Per day, Quick Heal Security Labs identifies thousands of spam emails carrying weaponized JAR as attachments targeting users. These malicious JAR i.e., jRAT malware upon execution, result in infecting users. Let’s take a look at a detailed analysis of this malware.

Infection chain

Fig 1: jRat Infection Chain
Fig 1: jRat Infection Chain

Here is an initial infection vector which is a spam email. As it looks legitimate, the user is tempted to download and open the attachment.

Fig 2: Spam Email
Fig 2: Spam Email

 

Below is a list of attachment names observed in these spam emails:

  • ITD_EFILING_FORM15CB_PR3.2.jar
  • MVD_SHPMNT_VSL_0004048_pdf.jar
  • Payment Swift Scan Copy 682017.pdf.jar
  • SHIPPING DOCUMENTS PDF.jar
  • SCAN DOC- 53862100.jar
  • FINAL COMPLETE SET OF SHIPPING DOCS.jar
  • PAYMENT_ADVISE_PDF.jar
  • PAYMENT_APLICATION_PDF.jar

After extracting the parent JAR file, it shows some java packages containing some long random filenames which contain raw data and class files. We have observed that malware actors are evolving malicious JARs with numerous obfuscations patterns. Some of the patterns are as follows:

Fig 3: Different Obfuscation Patterns
Fig 3: Different Obfuscation Patterns

 

Well-known decompilers failed to decompile the parent JAR file. Due to variation in obfuscation and encryption, (RSA, AES) makes static analysis more complex. Let’s see how malware behaves when it gets executed.

Execution of the parent JAR file drops two “.vbs”, two “.Class”, one “.Reg” and one “.dll” file at “%TEMP%” location. Every dropped file has a unique role in the infection cycle. Also, the parent JAR checks for a virtual machine using GlobalMemoryStatusEx() api which checks for the total physical and virtual memory available.

The parent JAR drops VBS files at %Temp% location with some random names. Also, it drops a JAR file with extension ‘.class’ at %Temp%. The parent JAR executes dropped the JAR file. The dropped JAR file is a jRAT malware.

The below images shows dropped vbs files:

Fig 4: VBS File to list down AV’s
Fig 4: VBS File to list down AV’s

 

Fig 5: VBS File to list down Firewall Products
Fig 5: VBS File to list down Firewall Products

Then jRAT malware executes VBS files using cscript.exe.

Fig 6 - 1

Fig 6: VBS File Execution by JAR
Fig 6: VBS File Execution by JAR

 

One of the VBS files enumerates a list of different firewall installed using WMI (Windows Management Instrumentation) functionality and the other one enumerates a list of third-party antivirus products using the same functionality upon execution.

The parent JAR also drops the “.Reg File” at %Temp% location and executes it using ‘reg.exe’. It creates registry entries of frequently used analysis tools such as ‘Procexp.exe’ ,’wireshark.exe’, ‘dumppcap.exe’ and some security products processes under “Image File Execution”. So, if any process started and if it has an entry under that key then the process gets killed.

Some registry entries are shown below:

Fig 7-1

Fig 7: Registry Entry under Image File Execution
Fig 7: Registry Entry under Image File Execution

 

The parent JAR executes actual jRat JAR file using java.exe. This jRat file is capable of communicating with a C&C server and can download executable payload.

To achieve persistence, it makes an entry into an auto-run registry so it can launch itself when the system reboots.

Fig 8: Persistence Entry in Registry
Fig 8: Persistence Entry in Registry

 

jRat connects with CnC IP “213.183.58[.]42 ”. The below image shows the TLS-encrypted SSL traffic after infection. After decoding the TCP stream on port 3012, we found the blacklisted certificate which is associated with jRAT JAR.

Fig 9: TLS-Encrypted SSL Traffic
Fig 9: TLS-Encrypted SSL Traffic

 

Below image shows the SSL certificate information and it has an entry in the SSL Blacklist:

Fig 10: SSL Certificate Information
Fig 10: SSL Certificate Information

 

Seqrite detection stats

Seqrite Email Security generically detects such malicious attachments.

Detection Name: JAR.Suspicious.A

Fig 11: Quick Heal Lab detection stats
Fig 11: Quick Heal Lab detection stats

 

After analysing the entire jRAT JAR infection chain, we noticed that the malware authors have been consistently changing the obfuscators to evade signature-based detection and using anti-debugging and anti-VM’s techniques. Furthermore, finding and disabling security solutions using numerous ways show how it got evolved.

Indicators of compromise

  • 213.183.58.42
  • 781FB531354D6F291F1CCAB48DA6D39F
  • 0B7B52302C8C5DF59D960DD97E3ABDAF
  • 938CF1BA5F8BDB516B5617826E0B08A1
  • 76985223E94342D0FAB80D8A4DB1707C

 

Subject Matter Expert

Prashant Kadam, Pawan Chaudhari | Quick Heal Security Labs

 Previous PostAttacks on SSL are on the rise: Know more who is hiding in your e...
Next Post  Cybersecurity: New threats taking off in the Aviation Industry
Pavankumar Chaudhari

About Pavankumar Chaudhari

Pavankumar is associated with Quick Heal Technologies as a Technical Lead (Research and Development) and is also a part of Vulnerability Research and Analysis Team....

Articles by Pavankumar Chaudhari »

Related Posts

  • data privacy

    The What, How, and Why of Data Privacy

    January 24, 2025
  • How the Recent Health Insurance Data Breach Could Affect You – and What You Can Do About It

    October 14, 2024
  • Defending against APT attacks with endpoint security

    How To Defend Against Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs): A Comprehensive Approach

    September 27, 2024
Featured Authors
  • Seqrite
    Seqrite

    Follow us for the latest updates and insights related to security for...

    Read more..
  • Sanjay Katkar
    Sanjay Katkar

    Sanjay Katkar is the Joint Managing Director of Quick Heal Technologies...

    Read more..
  • Mahua Chakrabarthy
    Mahua Chakrabarthy

    A tea connoisseur who firmly believes that life is too short for dull content....

    Read more..
Topics
apt (19) Cyber-attack (35) cyber-attacks (58) cyberattack (16) cyberattacks (13) Cybersecurity (322) cyber security (31) Cyber threat (33) cyber threats (48) Data (11) data breach (55) data breaches (28) data loss (28) data loss prevention (34) data privacy (11) data protection (24) data security (15) DLP (49) Encryption (16) endpoint security (107) Enterprise security (17) Exploit (14) firewall (11) GDPR (12) hackers (11) malware (76) malware attack (23) malware attacks (12) MDM (25) Microsoft (15) Network security (22) Patch Management (12) phishing (27) Ransomware (67) ransomware attack (30) ransomware attacks (30) ransomware protection (13) security (11) Seqrite (33) Seqrite Encryption (27) Seqrite EPS (33) Seqrite Services (16) UTM (34) Vulnerability (16) windows (11)
Loading
Resources
  • White Papers
  • Datasheets
  • Threat Reports
  • Manuals
  • Case Studies
About Us
  • About Seqrite
  • Leadership
  • Awards & Certifications
  • Newsroom
Archives
  • By Date
  • By Category
Loading

© 2025 Quick Heal Technologies Ltd. Cookie Policies Privacy Policies